Sovereignty matters: Africa, donors, and the aid relationship | African Affairs | Oxford Academic
African Union (e) Decision on Alternative Sources of Financing the The Africa Capacity for Immediate Response to Crisis: Advice for African Policy Brown W. () 'Sovereignty Matters: Africa, Donors, and the Aid Relationship'. Its relationship with economy should be translated into capital formation, provision of In Africa, foreign aid comes in diverse forms: Support of projects of This Conditionality was later viewed as rather hampering with sovereignty and . like terrorism that drew attention of donors on matters concerning migration, etc. A case study of the donor-recipient relationship between the EU and Ethiopia economy” that would combine economic and security issues within a maritime .. The country entered into these aid negotiations as a sovereign state .. far, and in what ways, African political actors are impacting on, and operating within, the.
To the extent that influence is successfully exerted it is therefore more deliberate and hence more directly political than that of, say, the cumulative influences of a series of private commercial actions.
The influence of aid is mainly located in relation to the middle two columns of the table, influencing policy choice and constitutional make-up. The latter is much less well established in terms of the extent to which donors consistently seek to apply such influence and the extent to which they do so effectively. The attempt to influence policy choices is the mainstay of debates around conditionality, post-conditionality and ownership.
Rendering oneself unable to make distinctions between issues of sovereignty and the different issues of control actually obscures what we are able to see when analysing aid relationships. The political and legal basis of the aid relationship The foregoing analysis suggests that the focus of our assessment of aid should be on areas of national control, not sovereignty as a right to rule.
This claim is further strengthened when considering the role that sovereignty as a right to rule plays in constituting the aid relationship and in the material effects this has on the parties' ability to engage in negotiations over the terms of aid.
In terms of the day-to-day practices of aid, sovereign authority is in fact the basis of both the granting and receipt of aid. For donors, often quite elaborate procedures and rules exist to authorize the granting of aid. Furthermore, donors require the identification and agreement of national authorizing agents in the recipient country.
While African policy autonomy may indeed be severely compromised by the aid relationship, the recognition of the right of African states to govern their own societies is not seriously questioned by donors through the aid relationship. Whatever other powers donors have, a socially recognized right to rule African societies is not one of them, nor is it sought: As for aid recipients, many have clear guidelines establishing precisely which ministries and representatives have the authority to act on behalf of the state in aid negotiations and implementation.
Indeed one of the effects of the Paris Declaration has been to clarify such roles. It therefore plays a central role in coordinating the framework of aid management and dialogue.
Even where NGOs are involved either independently or as conduits for bilateral aid, their presence and actions within a recipient country are subject to the legal imprimatur of the state concerned. Sudan's expulsion of thirteen NGOs in is a prominent example. The GoR [Government of Rwanda] retains a fundamental duty to ensure that all such [NGOs] — regardless of whether their activities are financed by ODA — act in a manner that is transparent and accountable to the Rwandan citizen.
Failure of Foreign Aid in Developing Countries: A Quest for Alternatives | OMICS International
The GoR's regulatory role in this respect is detailed in its Laws regulating the activities of national and international non-governmental organizations operating in Rwanda.
These examples all illustrate ways in which recognition of sovereign rights of recipient states creates the basis through which the aid relationship is conducted — it defines who the actors are and important aspects of their respective roles.
However, by doing this, sovereignty also shapes the way in which aid relationships are conducted. The need for negotiation in the first place comes about precisely because any aid programme requires the agreement of the recipient, because that recipient possesses sovereign independence and with it the right to agree or refuse aid programmes.
Conditionality, after all, is a means of offering incentives and threats to an independent party to persuade them to act in a certain way because donors cannot instruct them directly. Imperial fiat will not work in this circumstance. Misconstruing this as an attack on independence is merely a cheap defence by rulers to defend their precarious station.
As mentioned before, African rulers often maintain their positions through methods that foreign charities and institutions find abhorrent. To ensure that these policies are not adopted, rulers and their allies have to attack the advice — and as they cannot reasonably reject its merits without adequately trying them, they have to reject it as simply an affront to their independence.
But it is not. An invasion is an attack on sovereignty; underhanded politics, to take control of internal politics, is an attack on sovereignty; secret agencies and coups are an attack on sovereignty. Requiring a debtor or recipient nation to abide by reasonable codes of conduct, is not. Ramification of the debate As a result of the obsession with defending sovereignty over human rights, African nations have some of the worst human rights records, a history of genocide and conflict, terrible governance and a rejection of institutions and strategies that could address this.
The reason given is that the ICC excessively punishes Africans. While the ICC should also deal with other regions, it is undeniable that Africa also has a disproportionate number of war criminals and human rights abusers. The ICC is an enemy to many African rulers, true, but it is a friend to the victims of those rulers — the people.
I have already shown how there is no real assault on African sovereignty in the forms that rulers fear. Rather, a willingness to reform and embrace good governance will strengthen national sovereignty.
The power of elites, in the grander scheme, should not matter. What matters is the stability of the state, and the freedom and prosperity of the people. Loans and grants given to accelerate poverty reduction programs have shown little aptitude to reduce poverty. The study showed that the given aid is shrouded with hidden agenda from donors who set unbearable conditionality, hard to meet to yield desired results. At one hand, the inefficacy of foreign aid to eradicate poverty was seen as inherent to its nature and at the other hand, as results of its management and cycling by recipients.
Despite diversified kinds of intervention of the non-governmental organizations and civil societies in their variety social services delivery in health, mass education and mobilization, education, human rights preservation…their capacity to lead our nations to macroeconomic growth were not evident as in their good work, face numerous barriers from both donors and governments recipients.
Their problem solving strategies fail to be counted on for a sustained macroeconomic development. These beautiful verbiage formulations are yet to be seen on the ground and it seems it had failed to get to its desired destination. The paper recommends a new reawakening in the realm of cooperation and integration among African nations.
If foreign aid it to yield good results, the paper suggest casts off the recourse to unfruitful conditionalities which was seen rather harmful. Globalization and neoliberalization dynamics changed the view of the development idealists. The state is however the main actor in the development process. Its relationship with economy should be translated into capital formation, provision of infrastructural and legal framework development projects have to undertake.
In times of incapacity of the state to meet the economic commitment to render its primary services to the society, donors both local and international lenders of all origins intervene through loans, grants, aid etc. The Official Development Assistance ODA played this regulatory role for long before Breton woods institutions took over to assist countries facing hardship to deliver to the people by giving loans, economic bail out interventions and aid, with an aim of helping nations achieve middle come status.
This paper questions the significance, the purpose, justification of aid given to development nation. It will evaluate the significance and impact Foreign Aid has in the life of the economy of our developing countries.
It will be noteworthy to equally assess the level of performance of other development alternatives taken by developing countries, their strength and failure to eradicate poverty. Foreign aid to developing countries Aid given to developing countries is meant to help these countries develop and accomplish their development projects.
These aids may come from former colonial monopole to strengthen bilateral ties between the former colonies and their colonial powers. Loans can be given to be spent on goods bought from donor countries where consultancy fee are always inclusive. In Africa, foreign aid comes in diverse forms: Support of projects of investment, budget support, technical assistance of various projects, debt relief etc.
It may be given in forms of grants which may not have to be paid, loans payable at lower interest rate over a longer period, contributions or aid from UN institutions, IMF, WB or regional banks.
For instance, the USA gives its aid to countries to support: State capacity building to strengthen security and in conflict management and resolution. Or else, build up business partnership by supporting the generation of demand of US goods. Nature of foreign aid: The aid is classified in key thematic areas: Investment in people social welfare provisionenvironmental protection and climate change, support to non-state organizations involved in human development, food security and migration issues, EC No [ 1 ].
It may come to aid to local population in health sectors, education, housing and so forth as it is currently the case of European Union to the people of Burundi. They support civil society organizations to promote the atmosphere of good governance and protection of human rights, protection of natural resources, state building in post-conflict cases; it is also given to support national budget.
It can include humanitarian aid meant to offer quick relief intervention to alleviate suffering infringed by man-made disasters and conflicts. Evolution and views on foreign aid Historically, foreign aid has received bitter criticisms in the developing countries most especially in Africa. Only the elites become beneficiaries of nationally designed projected. On the site of the donors, neoliberals saw in Aid an extortion of resources, a long earned asset being dashed to impoverished nations incapable of making a best use of it to effectively come out of poverty.
This Conditionality was later viewed as rather hampering with sovereignty and dignity of countries because of their coercive nature. Jane and Toye [ 2 ] saw foreign aid as not only inefficiency to reduce poverty, but as means to foster dependency.
The political orientation of the country could determine how much aid it could receive. Aid could therefore be given to countries going aboard the way of electoral reforms, multiparty system and any other political act advocating democratic atmosphere.
These aids were also given to nations coming out of long times of conflicts to strengthen peace building in the country, supporting electoral processes or to empower new political formation and civil society organizations. Countries can be easily supported to deal with criminal activities such as human trafficking, cross boarder organized crimes, environmental threats, mainstreaming of gender which are normally connected to poverty [ 3 ].
The United Nations general assembly came to realize that some parts of the world were still in abject poverty and the assembly adopted the Millennium Development Goals MDGs that could be summed up in 8 specific objectives: The focus on primary universal basic education, eradication of poverty and hunger, reduction of children mortality and maternal health, combating communicative diseases HIV-AIDS, Malaria ensuring environmental sustainability and strengthening of partnership among nations.
These goals were to be endorsed and adopted by all nations and approved by the donor community. Besides these well-structured donor agencies, we have private contributors giving loans in forms of bilateral cooperation.
Dr William Brown | OU people profiles
The selection of recipients are mostly based on set indicatorspoverty status, political situation, level of respect of human right [ 4 ]. Failure of foreign aid in alleviating poverty in developing countries In most cases, the aid in forms of economic bail out has been seen as a form of economic exploitation and defective as it tends to rather deteriorate existing economy as in the IMF-related fiscal target always compel the recipient to adopt measures with harmful effects at a long run.
Workers are only contracted on part-time basis without being on payroll. As the aid does not come all at once, there is always lacuna in its efficacy. Carlos and Nicholas, assert that as it pass through a lengthy bureaucratic process where corruption, mismanagement and misuses make the given aid quite useless. This raises the antistate sentiment when new political formations are dictated by a new economic order. Foreign aid seen as exploitation Abundant theories and literature list numerous sources of failure of Foreign Aid but most of them converge on the fact that, Foreign Aid are short term interventions lacking lasting sustainable impact.
Some of these blame the world economic structure where LDC are put in perpetual dependency. African political economy is a product of western imposed models and ideologies. Foreign Aid has always been the last resort of most African nations as its acquisition has not demonstrated much laudable and commendable outcome and here goes the saying that, between two evils, the lesser is preferred. As Morrison [ 5 ] noticed, Foreign Aid can only be beneficial if it can positively affect the investment, makes it possible for countries to import capital goods or technology and does not directly affect the savings rate.
Many scholars converged on some factors making Foreign Aid not to work in developing nations especially in Africa: Foreign Aid is normally contracted for specific reasons: G [ 7 ] Foreign Aid remains unfavorable and ineffective as it remains volatile: The mode of disbursement is too lengthy and cumbersome and hence, the country fails to meet the time constraints projects have to take before completion.
In Ghana as in many African countries, the history of Foreign Aid showed a relative fiscal stability at the expense of employment at the era of Structural Adjustment Programs.
Its recourse to IMF loans where mostly in times of fiscal deficit, high exchange rate and inflation, increased debt and borrowing making the government unable to stabilize the economy. Elsewhere, though Foreign Aid could increase the access to social amenities and services, such as a relative rise in school enrollment for the basic education and health, this could not follow the increase of facilities and quality of services in those facilities.
In some studies made, [ 10 ] saw that it can only stabilize deteriorating poverty but not improve the situation, simply because it can take a longer time before the impact can be felt.
Africa’s obsession with sovereignty endangers human rights
Experiences however differ in many nations as Aid is meant to solve diverse problems but in most cases, its volatility and unpredictability makes it difficult for countries to factor it into long term spending plans and include it in budgets and therefore, its efficiency is questionable.
Funds meant to help governments achieve its mandate to combat poverty and alike may be directed by foreign policies of hidden economic or political agenda whereas, they must be subjected to adhere to conditions hard to meet, meant to enable its best utilization. Good signals of good governance, liberty and freedom of the citizens, security and human rights, constitutionally laid down governing system allowing participation and democratic institutions to operate; are those dependant variables if trespassed can result into freezing, withholding or withdrawal of aid.
Conditionality and its real impact on aid Along history, Foreign Aid has been viewed in different angles by both recipients and donors: In 70s it was criticized to be a form of domination and exploitation as it always fall in the hands of unprepared grounds, in the hands of leaders with no real vision, weak institutions and corrupt officials.
This also led to the formation of political parties and allowed competition on the political scenes to gain power [ 12 ]. This was meant to deny over tenure on power and a possible dictatorship which could hinder development and do away with western interest. It was toward the end of this period that we had nascent issues of security, like terrorism that drew attention of donors on matters concerning migration, etc. After this era, the world economic crises made poorest countries to be highly indebted and the London Club had to persuade creditors to be conscious on aid and impose Conditionality to countries receiving Foreign Aid so that they may put in place measures that could make it possible for them to pay back [ 13 ].
This Conditionality was seen as substitute of collateral assets as donors ensure that there is a clear and sound economic policy which will enable aid yield fruits.
Other analysts saw them as safeguard to moral hazards. This could be more frustrating when donor countries send their own experts to monitor the usage and usefulness of the aid to persuade and encourage the implementers to adhere to pre-established agreement.
Though this can be a way of ensuring being paid back, it has been also a way of imposing economic policy to countries as many name it imperialist way of keeping a hand on the management of affairs of other nations for their own gain [ 14 ].
Despite this bitter criticism, Foreign Aid, if well utilized, Rodrik [ 15 ] saw that it can improve domestic economic policies by inducing consistent flow of income over time.
Here is the justification. Justification for conditionality Aid is always given under Conditionality whose acclaimed aim is to ensure effectiveness in resolving problems for which they were to resolve.Relationships Advice/Sovereign Relationships
This aid can be withheld, removed or cancelled in times of trespasses or failure to adhere to Conditionality which are seen as sine qua none factors making aid yield results.