Objective: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Alvarado score for the de Alvarado como recurso clínico para el diagnóstico de la apendicitis aguda. de escalas diagnósticas de apendicitis aguda: Alvarado, RIPASA y AIR and has better accuracy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Introducción: la apendicitis aguda constituye la primera causa de Los mejores valores diagnósticos de la enfermedad para la escala fueron aquellos con.

Author: Yodal Narn
Country: Cyprus
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 16 December 2004
Pages: 260
PDF File Size: 15.46 Mb
ePub File Size: 13.21 Mb
ISBN: 641-9-65776-789-1
Downloads: 74954
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Moogugul

By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our Privacy PolicyTerms of Serviceand Dataset License. Results One hundred patients were included. Mean patient age was Usefulness of the Alvarado scoring system with respect to age, sex and time of presentation, with regression analysis of individual parameters.

The RIPASA system has 18 variables divided into 4 groups data, signs, symptoms and laboratory studies alvaeado them a value of 0. Distribution of the Variables of the Patients Included. Apdndicitis Discussed in This Paper. Predicting Survival in Geriatric Trauma Patients: Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso.

In order to avoid delayed diagnosis, to reduce the margin of error and to identify patients requiring emergency surgery or patients without AA, the application of a scoring scale would be very useful. Edematous appendicitis was observed in 2 cases, phlegmonous appendicitis in 30 patients, necrotic appendicitis in 21, and perforated appendicitis in 33 cases.

Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use.

With these data, ROC curves were generated to compare both scores. The further away from 1, the better the test is to differentiate between sick and healthy subjects.

  AFI 21-116 PDF

There was a problem providing the content you requested

J Evid Based Med Healthc, 3pp. Regarding the operation, all appendectomies were open surgeries; in 69, the McBurney-type incision was used, while 31 were performed with a midline laparotomy.

Cir Gen, 34pp. One billion dollars are spent each year on negative appendectomies, 4,5 so high rates of negative appendectomies are no longer acceptable. Excess weight and obesity. Afterwards, we calculated the likelihood criterils. To improve our services and products, we use “cookies” own or third parties authorized to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior.

Later, we calculated the LR for our results and for praa of the previous similar reports Table 4. Apedicitis distribution of AA cases was similar to other reports, predominantly affecting patients between the second and fourth decades of life.

APENDICITIS by Gustavo Rondon on Prezi

Singapore Med J, 51pp. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time?

KanumbaJoseph B. The authors have no conflict of interests to declare related with this research. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis nationwide analysis. The average time that elapsed from the initial assessment by the surgeon until the surgical resolution was 8.

Guardiola aEnrique A. Some features of this site may not work without it. Prospective, longitudinal, analytical, comparative and observational study. A descriptive statistical analysis of the demographic data of the population was completed, as well as the analysis avlarado diagnostic tests, using the pathology report as a gold aoendicitis sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], negative alvarrado value [NPV].

The body mass index is calculated by dividing weight in kilos by height squared in meters. There were no deaths during the present study.

The intraoperative findings for each of the patients were recorded, and the diagnosis of AA was confirmed with the pathology study of the excised appendix. The purpose of our study was to compare the ability of two clinical scoring systems, the Alvarado and the RIPASA scores, to diagnose or rule out appendicitis since computed tomography, ultrasound and laparoscopy have not been able to reduce the percentage of diagnostic error.


Are negative appendectomies still acceptable?. In hospitals like ours, the diagnosis of AA relies greatly on the clinical evaluation performed by surgeons. Show full item record.


En el surge la escala RIPASA mostrando alta sensibilidad y especificidad para poblaciones orientales, muy pocos son los estudios en poblaciones occidentales. The average positive LR of all the studies included in Table 4 for the Alvarado score was calculated at 3.

A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Different scoring systems have been created to increase diagnostic accuracy, and they are inexpensive, noninvasive, and easy to use and reproduce. JavaScript is disabled for your browser.

More than one patient presented more than one comorbidity. We defined residual abscess as the presence of intra-abdominal purulent collections after the surgical treatment of AA. The Alvarado system includes 3 symptoms, 3 physical signs and 2 laboratory parameters; each variable is assigned a value of 1 or 2 points. The Alvarado score published in is an assessment chart Table 1whose sum gives a maximum of 10 points with a higher probability that the patient has AA.

High negative appendectomy rates are no longer acceptable.