Objective: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Alvarado score for the de Alvarado como recurso clínico para el diagnóstico de la apendicitis aguda. de escalas diagnósticas de apendicitis aguda: Alvarado, RIPASA y AIR and has better accuracy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Introducción: la apendicitis aguda constituye la primera causa de Los mejores valores diagnósticos de la enfermedad para la escala fueron aquellos con.

Author: Kazrat Tazil
Country: Central African Republic
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Relationship
Published (Last): 19 October 2006
Pages: 414
PDF File Size: 18.88 Mb
ePub File Size: 3.51 Mb
ISBN: 925-1-68301-525-6
Downloads: 94489
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Fesar

The study was approved by the hospital’s Ethics Committee. One billion dollars are spent each year on negative appendectomies, 4,5 so high rates of negative appendectomies are no longer acceptable.

Acute appendicitis NOS disorder Search for additional papers on this topic. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time?

Show full item record.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J, 52pp. Prospective evaluation of the ability of clinical scoring systems and physician-determined likelihood of appendicitis to obviate the need for CT. Clinical Implications of Diverticular Disease of the There were no deaths during the present study.

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Alvarado and RIPASA scores in the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to correlate with the histopathological results. Within the studies comparing both systems Table 4Chong et al. ROC curves obtained by calculating the results of both scores.


A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis – a prospective study Henna E.

APENDICITIS by Gustavo Rondon on Prezi

It is still a difficult diagnosis to make, especially in young persons, the elderly, and in reproductive-age women, in whom a series of inflammatory conditions can have signs and symptoms similar to those of acute appendicitis. The distribution of AA cases was similar to other reports, predominantly affecting patients between the second and fourth decades of life. Contact Us Send Feedback. Skip to search form Skip to main content.

Arch Surg,pp. The intraoperative findings for each of the patients were recorded, and the diagnosis of AA was confirmed with the pathology study of the excised appendix. Showing of 15 references.

The average time between the onset of the symptoms and the first medical assessment was The further away from 1, the better the test is to differentiate between sick and healthy subjects.

References Publications referenced by this paper.

Some authors have also shown their advantage over imaging studies, 16 although this has not been confirmed by others. Predicting Survival in Geriatric Trauma Patients: Topics Discussed in This Paper.

The result consists of the sum of the values, with a maximum score of Chalya BMC surgery Once the score is established, the diagnosis of appendicitis is classified as doubtful with apendicitsi than 5 points, suggestive from 5 to 6 points, probable from 7 to 8 points, and very probable from 9 to 10 points.


Evaluation of the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. With these data, ROC curves were generated to compare both scores. Introduction In order to avoid delay in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and reduce apendicittis margin of error, the use of scales has been used. The average hospital stay was 3.

In contrast, Nanjundaiah et al. The sensitivity and specificity of Croterios Alvarado scale were Update on the Management of Non-obstetric Acute Abdomen in Cir Gen, 32pp. Leukocytosis higher than 10 The Alvarado score suggests, with a higher score, the probability that the patient has AA symptoms.

Int J Surg, 10pp. Distribution of the Variables of the Patients Included. KanumbaJoseph B. Emerg Med J, 33pp. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 24pp.

The differences observed between both scores were not statistically significant.