Potential Medieval Influences on the Character of Margaery Tyrell | Tower of the Hawk
Natalie Dormer and Jack Gleeson as Margaery Tyrell and King Joffrey Baratheon in "Game of Thrones. "Tommen". Obviously this show is relationship goals. Margaery, a third maiden archetype, is the femme fatale or “bad girl”—the one who Traditionally, she uses femininity and sensuality to achieve her goals. and thus Margaery asks Joffrey for hunting lessons and appeals to Joffrey's eagerness for Margaery's a consummate liar, twisting her relationship with Renly and. On HBO's "Game of Thrones," there are just "tactical relationships," Sophie Turner, Margaery (Natalie Dormer) gets to know her king, Joffrey (Jack to him and she kind of had a purpose and she knew her means of escape.
12 Couples That Hurt Game Of Thrones (And 8 That Saved It)
For me, and I think for a lot of people, House Tyrell was the family I wanted to be a member of the most. The Starks were probably the most realistic family unit but the Tyrells were the most appealing.
So it was really unfortunate that they got blown up. Olenna was very manipulative and controlling.
The one thing Margaery (aka, Natalie Dormer) is NOT going to miss on "Game of Thrones"
They were a very ambitious family, to be sure. Their sole motivation the entire time seemed to be just to rise as far as they could. They never had any particular goal to achieve with their newfound power or internal conflict to put to rest, right? Determination to climb the social ladder seems to have been an inherited ambition. The Tyrells started out as the stewards of the Gardeners and, when Aegon the Conqueror showed up, they took advantage of the situation and ended up on top.
Three centuries later, the family was still doing more or less the same thing. A vertical rise has been their sole motivation for their entire history. Olenna is kind of like the sassy grandma we wish we had.
Except for the murder and the assassinations. They seemed more modern, for good and ill. The Tyrells generally displayed a more Renaissance-era mindset than the other Westerosi families, particularly in the sense that they excelled in discreet political machinations and poisonings rather than outright military action.
The Tyrells were far from unique in that sense, though they were better at it than, say, the Starks. They prized beauty, fashion and architecture on a level beyond the other Westerosi families. They were also far more socially progressive and inclusive than most others.
Along with the Martells. Oh, true, we talked about that just last week! Their union has done nothing but lead to destruction, whether of their family or of their kingdom. Certain scenes in particular have also been doubly problematic, with implications of assault stirring up many a debate on the internet.
Thankfully, season 7 ends with Jaime seeming to come to his senses as he abandons his sister and sets off to chart his own course. The furor online among fans of both the television series and the book series was seemingly never-ending when the offending episode aired. There was truly no point to including the scene, or the plot entirely, in as graphic detail as it was written and portrayed.
Ramsay was already a truly psychotic, unpredictable, violent threat long before he assaulted and repeatedly abused Sansa. Subjecting her character to this incessant abuse did nothing for the series as a whole. Jon Snow and Daenerys Targaryen On the one hand, the relationship between Jon and Daenerys can bee seen as an inevitability of the series. Representatives of fire and ice finally meet in the middle and find themselves lost in passion with one another, just as their predecessors before them.
However, a plotted inevitability does not necessarily mean that the development feels in any way earned — or worth rooting for at all. While the series condemns the behavior of the Lannisters, it expects viewers to go all in on the pairing of Daenerys with her nephew, Aegon.
Melisandre and Stannis Baratheon To be fair, absolutely nothing that has come from Melisandre's character that could be considered a good choice. Her character is maddening, malicious, and entirely one dimensional. Then she was startled to see that it was Tommen on the courser, clad all in gilded plate. Tommen is too young for kisses, so she gives him kittens.Jack Gleeson talking about Joffrey's relationship with Margaery
This Margaery is scheming, passive-aggressive, and very conscious of the effect her sexuality has on others. They also significantly increased her age. The Burrito Dress is Everything. Firstly, they wanted a character who could behave in provocative manner, who can be unambiguously a sexual being.
But this creates a bit of an inconsistency for the narrative, especially in season five. She shows no interest in wielding political power, neither for its own sake nor for any stated political agenda. So she wants social status, she has it, how is Carol in her way exactly? This leaves us with the impression that she is being mean to Carol simply because she cannot have any social rivals whatsoever.
They are clinging to their chosen interpretation of the character as a manipulator, apparently for its own sake, without thought to the impact this characterization should have to the narrative. Hardly an empowering characterization for a progressive television show. As stated before, in the source material, Tommen is eight years old. He was recast for season four by an actor who was fifteen at the time.
He is currently seventeen, and was sixteen at the time of shooting season 5 I struggle for any explanation as to why they decided to make this casting change from the previous actor who was a few years younger unless it was BECAUSE they wanted to have the character become involved in a physical relationship.
They could have stuck more closely to the source material and cast an actor who could have passed for ten or eleven, and given how flexible the timeline seems to be, it would have presented no more problems for them then the choice to have him portrayed by a sixteen year old actor.
They could have chosen to completely remove sex as a possibility in this situation, they chose the opposite. What does it add to the story that Margaery is manipulating Tommen in a sexual manner, rather than by being his buddy and giving him kittens? Was it to titillate? Was it to make Carol more justified in her antagonism towards Margaery Boleyn? It certainly more understandable that a mother would want to remove a rival who is sexually expoilting her child, than one who is manipulating him by being nice to him.
Their dynamic thus far is very unequal. He is naive, trusting, and clearly emotional immature that is, he has not reached the emotional maturity of an adult, his level of maturity is fine for a thirteen-year-old. She is clearly an adult, in full control of the situation.
She is talking down to him, I would go so far as to describe her manner as patronizing. This kind of craving for adult attention is one of the things that sexual predators often exploit.
But that the showrunners would choose to proceed this way is troubling.
- Game of Thrones' top tyrant: King Joffrey Baratheon
- Beauty Battles Believability in Game of Thrones Costume Design for Margaery Tyrell Part 1
The fact is, this show is not produced in a cultural vacuum. In our own society, there is often reluctance to take the sexual abuse of children seriously when the victim is a boy and the perpetrator is an attractive woman.
So given that, a depiction of this kind of abusive situation in any popular media must be handled with special sensitivity. When I closely examine how the entire situation is framed within episode 3, I can find little evidence that this is a situation that is meant to be examined and challenged.