Infj and intj socionics relationship

How to convert MBTI® type to Socionics type

infj and intj socionics relationship

Why is it more emphasized and idealized more than any other I've seen? I have also notice a gender trend. Enfp-Intj are typically female enfp. These are recommended matches for INFJ according to socionics: INFJ +. Attractive + INTP - Benefit relations where INFJ is benefactor and INTP is beneficiary + ISFP - Benefit Mirror Relations + INTJ - Kindred Relations. infjs are not dominant but rather auxiliary, in socionics anyway since this is The INTj's social relations are on the whole calm and constant.

You even once said INFjs were inclined to be practical I just ignored that. INFjs know it when they see it even if they have never previously acknowledged or recognized it.

INFjs like to "confess" to personal flaws to themselves so that they can attempt to fix them. Like when discojoe talked of buying his father a utilitarian type of gift because apparently INFjs like that.

As offensive as that sounded at first, I instantly knew his father was indeed an INFj.

infj and intj socionics relationship

Or when Topaz talked of INFj's secretly liking rebellious people who act out their INFj repressions a lot, I would not generally admit this, but I knew that it was likely that he was in close contact with an INFj to know that. No INFj would ever willingly tell you that. How many INFjs here could honestly say that they take of and go to parties if they are upset enough like Cone's friend does?

Yes, but perhaps you figured that you would be ignored like all the other times. Generally, there is a trend here among certain people to "pick" on types they figure will not hit back or have few or no representatives here.

infj and intj socionics relationship

I don't know, I think we're both insecure about something. Like I said, he's impossible to impress, as nothing I do is good enough for him.

I am sure if he is really an INFj then he must be impressed by quite a few things about you if he persists in being your friend. Not all INFjs find it comfortable to express compliments even if they are thinking many good things about a person. This is a flaw common to INFjs and others.

INTJ and INFP Socionics Relationship (Benefit)

How am I supposed to say good things about him when he never acknowledges anything I do? INFjs assume that these can have only one unique interpretation the "correct" interpretationand INFjs often do not think about the fact that the other person may be interpreting them differently.

Much more than INTjs, INFjs apply concepts such as "objective reality," "unequivocal facts," and de-emphasize concepts; INFjs consider that they know the "right" way of doing things, how something "truly is," etc. When meeting someone knew, INTjs are not as likely as INFjs to perceive "getting to know somebody" as a special kind of activity.

INTjs know very well whey they are getting acquainted i. INTjs, in contrast with INFjs, do not divide the process of getting acquainted into consecutive stages; rather INTjs immediately establish the necessary emotional distance in contact and can regulate it if needed.

Differences between LII (INTj) and EII (INFj)

To bridge the gap between poorly acquainted people in a group INTjs amp up the emotional tone; this can be mutually experienced happiness or misfortune. The name and title of the person are of secondary relevance to INTjs and their relationship with the other person.

When something is perceived by INFjs as being incorrect, they are more likely than INTjs to tell the person who made the error what they did wrong and how to do it the right way. INFjs are focused on who made the error and helping them to correct the mistake.

Love Types: INFJ - Page 10

When working on a project, INTjs experience more discomfort than INFjs if the project does not have a clearly delineated end-goal or result. This happens because INTjs have more difficulty monitoring and understanding how the project is developing than INFjs because they are outside of the process.

INFjs are more likely than INTjs to use special rituals or other culturally accepted formalities when forming relationships with others. What that means is that the emotional proximity and relationship status for INFjs be more externally predetermined.

Additionally, INFjs generally progress in relationships through stages, and therefore are more familiar with these stages than INTjs. INFjs tend to be more linear in their relationship progression than INTjs, and INFjs assign importance to the formalities of recognizing the start and end to each of these stages.

INTjs are more likely than INFjs to seek new and novel experiences rather than returning to something already lived through. They will generally only re-read a book, re-watch a movie, or revisit the same place if they have forgotten it or are hoping to learn something new from it. INFjs are often better at solving and minimizing interpersonal problems, where as INTjs often struggle understanding them. INFjs tend to prefer using persuasion as a means of convincing others to do something, where as INTjs prefer to use argumentation as a means of convincing others.

INTjs are more likely to make decisions based on logical reasons than INFjs, who are more likely to make decisions based on their own feelings. For INFjs, resources like their money, time, sleep, etc.

  • MODERATORS

INTjs are more likely than INFjs to perceive and distinguish themselves primarily through personal qualities. When conversing, INFjs types are inclined to communicate in the form of monologues, where each party has "its turn.

Conversely, INTjs tend to prefer more of a question and answer style format. When INFjs form opinions of others, these opinions are formed under the influence of their attitude towards the group to which the person belongs.

To INFjs, it is incomprehensible how it is possible to belong to two opposing groups at the same time: This is based on the ability of INFjs to draw conclusions about the person based on the groups the person belongs to; INTjs are more reluctant to make these inferences.