Consumer and producer relationship

Example: Producer Consumer Relationship Report

consumer and producer relationship

Notion of consumers–producers co-operation allows better understanding of the basic mechanisms of homeostasis. This concept refers to the biological. Producer-consumer relationships in typical products supply chains: where are the theoretical differences with standard products? SUMMARY. At the beginning . In our economy, there are also producers and consumers, and, believe it or not, the relationship between producers and consumers in the economy is not that.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Animals such as as humans that usually have diets rich in both plants and animal sources are known as omnivores. Producers' biology allows plants to manufacture their own food through a process called photosynthesis, which is driven by energy from sunlight harnessed by the leaves.

17. Mapping Consumer Theory to Producer Theory

Photosynthesis results in glucose production, some of which plants use themselves in growth and other metabolic activities but most of which serves as food for consumers or simply decays when the plant dies. Consumer Essentials Consumers are animals. Consumer biology means that they cannot make their own food and must eat other organisms for nourishment.

consumer and producer relationship

As noted, herbivores eat only plants, carnivores eat only other animals and omnivores eat both. An example containing all of these types of consumers would be a forest that included birds that are strictly carnivores, deer that are herbivores and bears that are omnivores. Bears are also scavengers, meaning that they eat things that are already dead usually animal flesh.

Consumers and Producers

Levels of Consumers Consumers occupy different levels within food webs or food chains. In simplest terms, primary consumers are one level above producers and are the herbivores. Secondary consumers are one level up and eat herbivores; tertiary consumers are one level up still and eat herbivores and secondary consumers.

Opportunities and challenges of the production-consumption relations In theory, short food supply chains require closer geographical proximity, the active participation of and a connection between producers and consumers. This study has shown that this will vary according to the context.

Nevertheless, there are some common characteristics such as: We also highlight that buying from alternative networks reduces environmental impact by reducing plastic packaging and lowering energy used for transportation. For producers, there are more advantages than disadvantages in short distribution channels such as those shown in table 2. Findings point to the fact that they allow for more producer autonomy, direct contact with consumers, financial transactions without the involvement of middlemen, as well as fairer remuneration and lower risks of losses during trade.

As we have seen in the previous section, investment in the training of producers, management of the farm and production planning are key factors for reducing obstacles such as the lack of workforce, adjustments between supply and demand, as well as investment in infrastructure and logistics. Taking into account the historical, social and economic contexts, Brazilian producers have greater challenges when compared to their French counterparts.

The experiences studied confirm that the synergy and symbiosis of ecologically-based family agriculture with short distribution channels foster sustainable development. From the consumers' point of view, alternative networks bring opportunities that lead to changes in dietary habits, encourage taste education, and the organization and mobilization of consumers in campaigns for healthy diets against agrochemicals and genetically modified production, for example.

Thus, alternative networks involve experiences that can help us to develop public policies geared toward sustainable consumer standards.

consumer and producer relationship

However, it is important to take into account that this is a slow process. That is, it takes time to empower consumers and make them aware of factors such as the seasonality of ecological production, knowledge of the difficulties producers face, changes in attitude with regard to regularity, quantity and diversity, easily fulfilled by industrial agriculture and which are lacking in ecological production.

It allowed us to build a typology of the main short food supply chains SFSCsas well as analyze their characteristics and observe challenges and opportunities for production and consumption relations. Indeed, short food supply chains are ways of moving away from the standards imposed by the industrial food system which brings uniformity to ways of life and steers consumption.

More than fitting the experiences studied into static definitions and typologies, the wide range of models found in both France and Brazil confirms the innovative potential of alternative food networks in mobilizing actors and searching for suitable solutions for ecologically-based family agriculture, taking into account the different contexts.

consumer and producer relationship

These initiatives open the way to debates on new conceptions of local development and public policies which can encompass not only technical and productive, economic and environmental variables, but also social, ethical and cultural values. Principles such as autonomy, solidarity, food security, social justice, respect for local culture and traditions can be incorporated into producer-consumer relations.

Developed by the authors This study confirms the hypothesis that short food supply chains are viable and can strengthen alternative food networks when associated to features of ecological production small sites, family workforce, diversified production, producer autonomy, links with consumers, biodiversity preservation, the enhancement of the environment, food quality and health products. Progress appears to be greater in experiences where networks are created with the support of public policies and include interaction between different actors government, non-governmental organizations, and groups of producers and consumers in terms of food distribution and decision-making.

These experiences also seem to foster new models of participatory management. This work points to opportunities, but also highlights the challenges that need to be overcome in terms of production, distribution and consumption. Thus, public policies and future academic studies should be geared toward overcoming obstacles such as the reduced volume of agroecological production; the small range and lack of regularity in the supply of ecological products; discrepancies between supply and demand; as well as problems in infrastructure and logistics.

Furthermore, there needs to be more investment in consumer awareness education based on reliable consumer information. The evolution of markets based on short food supply chains can contribute to changes in consumer habits, leading toward healthy eating and the creation of new markets for ecological production. Challenges involve the building of production, distribution and trade support frameworks in conjunction with institutional and financial support as well as policies, in particular those involving organized groups of family producers at the initial stage of the agroecological transition process.

Within this new producers-consumers relationship, consumers search for products that "look like the producer", where the traits of local communities are visible, such as traditions, ways of life, local know-how, care for the landscape, together with ecological, seasonal products at fair prices.

This set of unique characteristics, present in short food supply chains, is in itself what consumers are looking for to boost quality, leading to new social relations and new values. It also rescues the autonomy of producers.

Finally, participating in short food supply chains and alternative food networks involves social, economic, environmental and political values which contribute to conscious consumption. This study has shown the need to reinvent local markets, reconnect producers and consumers and establish new relations between production-distribution-consumption.

Revista Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente.

Consumer-producer relationship and homeostasis.

Annablume; CNPq; Petrobras, Circuits courts et vente directe: Les Circuits courts de commercialisation en agriculture: Les circuits courts alimentaires: Une revue de travaux anglophones en sciences sociales. Economie Rurale 3, n. Is the consumer soluble in the citizen? Mobilization in alternative food systems in France.

The quality 'turn' and alternative food practices: Journal of Rural Studies, v. Place and space in alternative food networks: Connecting production and consumption. Knowledge, Practice, and Politics.

Sevilla, IFO 14, Theoretical and practical ingredients. Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition, n. European Society for Rural Sociology, Oxford, v. Consumer deskilling and the gendered transformation of food systems, Agriculture and Human Values, n.

Yves Michel, p. Terrains et Travaux, n. Learning democracy through food justice movements. Agriculture and Human Values23, pp. Reconnecting Farm, Food, and Community.


University Press of New England. Food supply chain approaches: Moving Alternative Food Networks beyond the Niche. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 20 3pp.

Les circuits courts multi-acteurs: The school food revolution.

  • Example: Producer Consumer Relationship Report
  • Consumer-producer relationship and homeostasis.

Isara, 34 p, Vers une alimentation durable? Le courrier de l'environnement de l'INRA, n. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Foodv.

consumer and producer relationship

As novas formas sociais do trabalho no meio rural: Local food as a contested concept: International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food16 2pp. Moving from Consumer to Food Citizen.

Agriculture and Human Valuesv.